Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed a proposed order to resolve its lawsuit against Credit Repair Cloud and CEO Daniel A. Rosen for providing substantial assistance or support to credit repair businesses that charge illegal advance fees to consumers. The proposed order, if entered by the court, would impose a $2 million civil penalty against Rosen and a $1 million civil penalty against Credit Repair Cloud.
We are following very closely this appeal to the 10th Circuit of the preliminary injunction issued by the Federal District Court for the District of Colorado to the plaintiffs (three trade groups) enjoining the Colorado Attorney General and UCCC Administrator from enforcing the new Colorado opt-out statute against out-of-state, state banks who made loans from out-of-state to Colorado residents.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) recently issued a circular to law enforcement agencies and regulators, highlighting how broad nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) could violate whistleblower protections under Section 1057 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA). These agreements, if not carefully worded, may deter employees from reporting misconduct or cooperating with investigations, thus undermining the CFPB’s enforcement efforts.
We have recently blogged about two other actions in which this issue has been raised (one being a declaratory judgment action filed against the CFPB on July 23, 2024 in the E.D. Tex. and the other being an enforcement actionfiled in the N.D. Tex. in which a motion to dismiss was filed on July 31, 2024).
The landscape of payments fraud is undergoing a shift as traditional detection methods become increasingly inadequate against sophisticated fraud schemes. Conventional rules-based systems, relying on static rules and predefined patterns, are falling short in adapting to the dynamic tactics of modern fraudsters.
.jpg)
.jpg)