On June 25, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a decision affirming summary judgment in favor of a consumer reporting agency (CRA) that allegedly issued an inaccurate consumer report by inadvertently including the subject’s twin brother’s speeding ticket in the background check report. The decision provides useful guidance on the standard for “reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy” under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the circumstances under which a CRA may rely on official court records without further investigation.
In the modern recovery space, institutions are competing with a consumer budget that is increasingly fixed and recurring. Success requires an infrastructure that makes it easy to understand these trends through data. By using a digital clearing house to bridge the gap between policy and economic reality, credit providers can ensure their strategies remain effective, professional, and resilient.
The New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) has published an updated Notice of Adoption for its debt collection SHIELD Rule, confirming that the regulations will take effect on Sept. 1, 2026. The updated notice incorporates revisions made earlier in 2026, including changes to reporting requirements for collection agencies, updated validation and verification procedures, and the finalized penalty schedule for rule violations.
The advisory opinion had addressed the content of the written plan that would have been required for the SPCP and the data that could have been used to support a determination that the SPCP was necessary because people sharing those characteristics probably would not have received credit or would have received it on less favorable terms than those ordinarily available to other applicants. The CFPB stated it “has determined that the advisory opinion should be rescinded, as it is now outdated and inconsistent with the recent amendments to Regulation B” under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Michigan lawmakers are moving forward with a series of bipartisan bills that would significantly change how medical debt is collected, reported, and managed throughout the state. The legislative packages would establish new requirements for medical debt collection practices, limit credit reporting of medical debt, and create uniform hospital financial assistance programs.
.jpg)
.jpg)